Drawing Lines in the Social Sand
Image credit: Elli Rader
Recommended by the Editor
On Living Modern Life WellSeparating business acquaintances from personal friends and family is not usually a difficult task. Unless, that is, you’re trying to do so online.
Given the nature of my work, I often have to work to keep my business connections and social affiliations separate. I have often redirected Facebook friend requests to my CleverKate business page because I keep my personal page to people who know me, well, personally.
I’m not the only one who has to navigate this delicate divide. Several readers submitted questions about how to effectively separate their online associations.
Laura Culbertson (@lkculbertson) said she often finds it hard to be engaging on various social networks because of her job and uncertainty over what can and should be shared. “I see my professional contacts as just as important as my personal connections. How do you best tackle this?” she asked. Similarly, Marcos Lopez-Carlson (@marcoscopic) asked: "How do you draw a line between who you connect with and where? Do you differentiate between professional and social connections by channel or based upon the person?"
It’s worth noting first that many companies have their own social policies to serve as guideposts for employees. If your company has rules, follow them. It’s that simple.
Personal guidelines are more fluid, but I believe some separation is in order.
Personally, I use an individual Facebook page to engage with family and friends with whom I’m comfortable sharing more personal posts. My business page is meanwhile geared towards acquaintances and people who are fans of my work.
When it comes to Twitter, I jump in whenever my interest is piqued or to share something I think others will love. I'm much more casual on Twitter, than I would ever consider being on LinkedIn, which I see as a strictly professional place—an online resume, if you will— that is meant primarily for job seekers and networking opportunities.
I choose not to link my accounts or to crosspost, so that each network is treated separately based on their distinct purpose.
But even if each network has its own rules and purpose, a certain amount of crossover is inevitable. My four main social network populations look like this:

The bottom line is that social networks should bring you closer to the information, images, and people you enjoy and want more of in your life. When deciding who to add, and in what degree, it's less about the network and more about the person themselves.
Although the lines can be blurry, ask yourself one or more of these questions: Do I want to know more about this person? Do I want them to know more about me? Is this beneficial professionally?
Chances are you'll have a clear answer whether or not to add someone after weighing in on these simple questions. If not, let it settle for a bit. Time has a way of making hard decisions easier.
Are there any solutions that have worked well for you?
+ Kate O’Reilly’s column, on Living Modern Life Well, appears every other Tuesday. It is designed to help readers navigate the digital age, from Facebook to LinkedIn and all points in between. O’Reilly, aka Clever Kate, has a strong communications pedigree, and hopes to use that knowledge to answer reader questions. To ask a question, send an e-mail to kate.oreilly@tigeroak.com, or track her down on Twitter @cleverkate.









Comments
Constructive comments are awesome.
"I don't understand the point of this series. It seems to lack the depth of experience usually found in an advice column. The author doesn't explain how or why her "lives" must be so carefully separated or what her professional experience is that qualifies her to speak on the subject. Superficial and somewhat narcissistic."
Readers asked Kate particular questions on how to separate their personal and professional lives when it comes to social networking. Kate answered those questions in a thoughtful manner by relating them back to the methods that she has found works for her. You complain that she didn't explain why her "lives" must be carefully separated or what her professional experience is that qualifies her to speak on the subject, yet you also deem the column to be narcissistic? This is slightly contradictory and wholly confusing. I invite you to do further research into Kate O'Reilly's professional experience - notice that you can find it detailed both in this and previous columns as well as on the other online resources that are listed in her column bio. If anyone is qualified to speak on how to manage your professional and personal lives well in an increasingly-digital world, it's Kate.
And, if you feel that she did not address a particular issue or question that you would have liked to have seen in the column, then I encourage you to send your specific social media query to her...as you will notice in the comment section, Kate is wonderfully receptive to both comments and questions, even if said comments and questions may come off as willfully ignorant and/or thinly-veiled griping.
Also - loved the graphs, Kate. They added a pop of color and visual interest to your column, and opened my world up to Path. I didn't know what it was when I saw it on the graph, so I Googled it on my own volition instead of expecting you to hold my hand and explain it in detail to me. The beauty of the internet!
I agree with CleverJennie:
I agree with CleverJennie:
"This advice works very well for you, but not the type of people who would be looking for social media advice from a local magazine (who they are, I often wonder). In the future, I'd like to see columns that are less about Kate O'Reilly and are more applicable to the Metro Magazine audience."
I don't understand the point of this series. It seems to lack the depth of experience usually found in an advice column. The author doesn't explain how or why her "lives" must be so carefully separated or what her professional experience is that qualifies her to speak on the subject. Superficial and somewhat narcissistic.
Reply to CleverJennie (not verified)
1) I'm lucky that I have a business page to direct these people to. If you don't, and you don't feel comfortable adding them to your personal page, then you can hit Not Now, think more about it, and add them at another time if appropriate. Another option if you do decide to let them in, is to limit the amount of information you let them see. For information on how to do so, go here: https://www.facebook.com/about/privacy/your-info-on-fb.
2) I only did my top 4 social networks, as mentioned in the article. It was used an example to show how they can overlap. I had added more at one point and it was way too much information; looked messy.
3) Very good point. I only share online what I'm comfortable with the world (potentially) seeing. The other stuff is meant for one-on-ones with good friends and family.
4) This is my experience and meant only to offer a glimpse at what one person's looks like. Please share what yours looks like and what systems work for you. Ask friends what they do to help figure out what works, or doesn't, for you personally.
Good luck and thanks for your comments.
Some suggestions
You mention that you direct professional people to your CleverKate page, but what about people who don't own businesses? Should I make a "Clever Jennie, Your Coworker" Facebook page to redirect my colleagues or professional network when they want to friend me?
The infographic offers me no information. There is no inherent value associated with any of the circles. I would have just made three lists "Personal", "Business", and "Overlapping". While less colorful, it would have taken less time to digest. Where's Google+, Foursquare and Instagram? You never discussed what Path is. I've been on Path for over a year and had to take a second look because it's not a very wide-known application.
What about the argument that nothing you post online is truly private as long as it is associated with your real name? People who are your "friends" can easily share what you've said in the privacy of Facebook friendship. We all cried about this yesterday: http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/the-40-absolutely-worst-people-in-america
This advice works very well for you, but not the type of people who would be looking for social media advice from a local magazine (who they are, I often wonder). In the future, I'd like to see columns that are less about Kate O'Reilly and are more applicable to the Metro Magazine audience.
Post new comment